Post by Progenitor A on Jan 1, 2011 10:15:40 GMT 1
There may, or may not, be a reasonable case for allowing homosexuals to adopt babies.
Personally I do not think that there is very much of a case if Political Correctness is disregarded, but that pernicious doctrine rules with such Stalinist inflexibility and righteousnous that it is impossible to discuss certain proscribed subject without personal abuse, and indeed in many cases falling foul of the PC laws which might have been copied from the disciplinary books of the Dominican order of Black Friars (famous for the ir Inquisitorial zeal)
Already it has made for dire consequences in the adoption field, but what is over-ridingly important is, of course, that the homsexual lobby is given whatever it may want.
Now whether there is a good case for it or no, it is undoubted that the the Elton John adoption (or is it surrogate fatherhood) has done the case for homosexual fathering no good at all, and for that reason alone, people who share my views may reluctantly welcome the development.
For the sight of degenerate super-rich homosexual couples (and similarly heterosexual singles) trolling the world looking for a new fashion accessory to embellish their 'life-style'and simultaneously make a point for 'homosexual liberation' is illuminatingly unedifying.
For it is no mere coincidence that such adoptions make the world's headlines - the adoption gambit (whatever other motives may be in play) is surely a part of the insatiable demand for publicity that these people must have, it seems.
The decadence must appall civilsed people; a child as an icon of homosexual liberation.
What a shame poor Elton did not take any notice of the Romanian authorities that refused him adoption of a new baby-bauble, when they said 'You are too fat, too old, and homosexual'
But money combined with PC will always find a way.
Personally I do not think that there is very much of a case if Political Correctness is disregarded, but that pernicious doctrine rules with such Stalinist inflexibility and righteousnous that it is impossible to discuss certain proscribed subject without personal abuse, and indeed in many cases falling foul of the PC laws which might have been copied from the disciplinary books of the Dominican order of Black Friars (famous for the ir Inquisitorial zeal)
Already it has made for dire consequences in the adoption field, but what is over-ridingly important is, of course, that the homsexual lobby is given whatever it may want.
Now whether there is a good case for it or no, it is undoubted that the the Elton John adoption (or is it surrogate fatherhood) has done the case for homosexual fathering no good at all, and for that reason alone, people who share my views may reluctantly welcome the development.
For the sight of degenerate super-rich homosexual couples (and similarly heterosexual singles) trolling the world looking for a new fashion accessory to embellish their 'life-style'and simultaneously make a point for 'homosexual liberation' is illuminatingly unedifying.
For it is no mere coincidence that such adoptions make the world's headlines - the adoption gambit (whatever other motives may be in play) is surely a part of the insatiable demand for publicity that these people must have, it seems.
The decadence must appall civilsed people; a child as an icon of homosexual liberation.
What a shame poor Elton did not take any notice of the Romanian authorities that refused him adoption of a new baby-bauble, when they said 'You are too fat, too old, and homosexual'
But money combined with PC will always find a way.
