|
|
Post by carnyx on Feb 8, 2011 22:09:41 GMT 1
Oh Deeply Silly STA ...
How does the data get into the store? Doesn't it have to be Transmitted? And doesn't the store have to Recieve it?
And I love the 'all travels at the same speed.. and don't need clocks ' schtick. Oh Really ...
.... see that T in V= D/T?
How do you measure that, without a clock?
And ooooooh Deeply Chicken STA ..
Where is your definition of Information? "Please Sir the Cat Ate It?" Or is it more like Blair's WMD.. .. yebutnobutye ...
Bollocks, STA .... you lose the argument
You have been thrashed, again, as I warned you would unless you could not keep it civil.
sad really .. could have been fun .. but STA can't play, see.
Close of thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by speakertoanimals on Feb 9, 2011 13:22:45 GMT 1
Except again, the information and the transmission of the information are two different things, that you, in your usual muddled, silly way, keep conflating into one.
no, YOUR claim was that it was a clock, not that it needed a clock. DO try and be consistent on your madness.
More delusions.
That's all you can do, play silly games and produce endless postintgs full of utter nonsense.
|
|
|
|
Post by carnyx on Feb 9, 2011 16:12:56 GMT 1
@sta,
Oh, the ignorance!
1. Can't see that storing information requires an act of of transmission and reception, both of which involve time.
2. Thinks that time can be quantised without a clock ....
3. Believes that time is a physical quantity, rather than a concept which exists only in the human mind.
I warned you, STA, that operating at the emotional level, with no real intellectual contribution except a regurgitation of second-hand stuff .. and a latching-on to the superficial as a deliberate ploy to derail the thread .... and crude insults that are designed to provoke a dogfight .. and an unwilllingness to start a thread .... will reveal you as a mere misanthrope ..
And at the end of this long thread, the evidence is there: indelible proof of your bad faith, and there is nothing you can do that will alter it. STA, this thread alone shows you are dull, and full of a kind of hate that makes you stupid. You haven't an ounce of originality or creativity, and wish only to wreck.
|
|
|
|
Post by speakertoanimals on Feb 9, 2011 16:59:54 GMT 1
No, I refer you back again to your claim that transmission of information WAS a clock.
Transmitting things so that the order is retained is all that is required,which does not require a clock, just a repeatable process, or even just sending one bit, waiting to hear back that it has been rceived, then sending the next. It is neither a clock nor requires one, just sequence.
Another one of your unwarranted assertions. Time certainly seems to make sense as a physical quantity, and since relativity shows that time is bound up with space, you can't ditch one without ditching the other. DO you really want to ditch space as well, as just another supposed concept that exists only in the human mind? Which would surely reduce you to solipsism, and all these message boards just be you talking to yourself inside your own head -- and that way doesn't just lead to madness, but would be madness...................
O come, come! Surely a rather gradiose claim just based on my propensity for calling you an idiot when what you produce is idiotic! What are we forced to conclude, yet again, from YOUR performance, but a wish to play, and a childish inclination to throw your toys out of the pram when anyone dares to comment on your burblings...........
I suggest a play-pen might be approriate, or being sent to bed early without any tea......................
|
|
|
|
Post by carnyx on Feb 9, 2011 17:27:26 GMT 1
STA, I warned you at the beginning of this thread to stop your casual asperities, which would only cause the degeneration of this thread into your preferred zero-sum game, and which which you would lose.
Bit in your dull stupidity you did not understand what was being said, so you have had it communicated to you the hard way, by continual whackings on your snout. Now you are beaten and have lost even at your own game.
But still this obtuseness! It has clearly not dawned on you that people come here for fun .. for recreation ..and in your own words...
But your churlish reactions are jarringly out of place and with your remarks that speak of jealousy and hatred, attempt only to start a zero sum game at which you seek to win. It is not even envy ... which at least has an inquisitive edge.. but we never see questions from you; just statements ... which makes you a mere hater.
Now, with your bloody nose, it is time you buggered off, STA, or you'll get another lesson in manners. You came on this thread as you do on every other thread, bent on destruction; but in this instance it is you who have been destroyed.
Go.
|
|
|
|
Post by abacus9900 on Feb 9, 2011 17:28:08 GMT 1
carnyx, I'm surprised that you haven't yet come to the conclusion that STA is nothing other than a wind-up merchant seeking thrills. She may also be a man-hater.
|
|
|
|
Post by carnyx on Feb 9, 2011 17:30:07 GMT 1
Abacus, we cross-posted. Yes, I agree, as you see.
|
|
|
|
Post by speakertoanimals on Feb 9, 2011 18:25:09 GMT 1
And now we see the usual last-resort of scoundrels -- resorting to silly sexist and homophobic remarks.
O dear, I can't beat that woman in an argument, so I'll just throw the usual man-hater epithet at her, in order to try and disguise the fact that I can't actually counter what she has to say.
Which shows your own motivation quite clearly --rather than any serious discussion or desire to learn, just a silly desire to try and wind-up others, and hurl daft attempted insults, because you derive some sorry form of amusement from that.
As I said before, childish and silly, and the usual childish response of 'I hate you, I hate you, you're mean!' when an adult turns up and refuses to play your silly little game.
O you wish! All your silly bluster makes no impact on me. What a silly little person you are.........................
|
|
