|
Post by mrsonde on Sept 25, 2018 2:06:40 GMT 1
Okay, cowardly rat. By "people like yourself" I mean in particlar people who have earned their fortunes - very considerable fortunes - from forcibly extracting their salraies from working people by giving them "services" that they haven't asked for, have no option but to receive, and no choice but to have shoved down their throats. And you have the nerve to call anyone who earns their living by an honest means "authoritarian"!
Round One to me.
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Sept 25, 2018 2:08:42 GMT 1
And? Do what you like. Where's any "authority" in that? I'm just telling you - you'll lose that particular game. I know, from long experience from people like you, and a certain amount of experience of you yourself. Ad you don't think that's egocentric and solipsistic? Nope. I think you simply don't understand English. You're trying hard to express a thought, but you're struggling to find the right vocab.
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Sept 25, 2018 2:12:50 GMT 1
We owe more to Merriam-Webster than you, or most people, think. Don't be so sniffy. Anti-Americanism isn't a good idea. Especially if we're leaving the EU. Websters is fine enough. So we've moved from solipsism to selfish, have we? I state it. Your line.
|
|
|
Post by aquacultured on Sept 25, 2018 2:17:23 GMT 1
OK, cowardly rat is now your default.
2 points against you for me in the insult tally.
As for the rest, as I've told you before, I couldn't possibly have earned a fortune in the circumstances and time I was employed by the government.
Indeed, as you like to tell everyone, I De-worm Donkeys Down in Devon Dese Days; and am looking for a second job.
Another 5 points against you in your absurd calculus.
=7
|
|
|
Post by aquacultured on Sept 25, 2018 2:20:44 GMT 1
FFS, you asked for a citation or quote from a dictionary and have simply ignored it, as it doesn't suit your purpose.
|
|
|
Post by aquacultured on Sept 25, 2018 2:25:21 GMT 1
Oh, I see you've stated as fact something of which you definitely have no knowledge. Maybe we're beyond solipsism, then. I'm calling The Ghostbusters.
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Sept 25, 2018 2:28:13 GMT 1
OK, cowardly rat is now your default. Yep. I call it as I see it. Noooo, nooooo. Shall we halt proceedings and do a proper tally? No "before" as far as I recall! As far as I recall, what you've broadcast so far - you might like to emend - is that you left college and went into the cs, rose through the ranks enough to rub shoulders with Thatcher and sit at the table to determine how to prevent incidents like the Rotherham debacle, and were humble yet deservedly elevated enough to turn down a certain amount of Establishment gongs. Please don't ask me to trawl through archives to verify all that nonsense. There's no calculus, really. Exploiter vs exploited, is all that it amounts to, really. I pay for you, you don't pay for me. I work for you, you don't work for me. It's as simple as that. If we're talking about "authoritarianism", We are, aren't we?
|
|
|
Post by aquacultured on Sept 25, 2018 2:35:13 GMT 1
Ad you don't think that's egocentric and solipsistic? Nope. I think you simply don't understand English. You're trying hard to express a thought, but you're struggling to find the right vocab. OK, this is what you normally say to people you know are native English-speakers. That's not a question, simply an observation. If you don't want to be thought of as arrogant, why be so habitually supercilious? You probably don't understand cockney, either, do you? Probably think they're all uneducated, eh?
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Sept 25, 2018 2:40:13 GMT 1
FFS, you asked for a citation or quote from a dictionary and have simply ignored it, as it doesn't suit your purpose. I don't follow links, as a rule, unless they're from people whose intellectual integrity I trust. I see from that one it's not really delivering what you advertised. So you wish to say I'm an "extreme egotist", I take it. Not what "solipsist" means, in my opinion, but never mind. Justify that charge, please, if you can. What have I said - in those few posts - that could possibly justify such an insult?
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Sept 25, 2018 2:41:42 GMT 1
Oh, I see you've stated as fact something of which you definitely have no knowledge. What might that be?
|
|
|
Post by aquacultured on Sept 25, 2018 2:44:31 GMT 1
OK, cowardly rat is now your default. Yep. I call it as I see it. Noooo, nooooo. Shall we halt proceedings and do a proper tally? No "before" as far as I recall! As far as I recall, what you've broadcast so far - you might like to emend - is that you left college and went into the cs, rose through the ranks enough to rub shoulders with Thatcher and sit at the table to determine how to prevent incidents like the Rotherham debacle, and were humble yet deservedly elevated enough to turn down a certain amount of Establishment gongs. Please don't ask me to trawl through archives to verify all that nonsense. There's no calculus, really. Exploiter vs exploited, is all that it amounts to, really. I pay for you, you don't pay for me. I work for you, you don't work for me. It's as simple as that. If we're talking about "authoritarianism", We are, aren't we? None of your stuff is true. Indeed it's quite idiotic. My lawyers say you're obviously hopelessly deluded, therefore can't be sued. If only, mrsonde, you knew. But I think you'd rather not, so that Aunt Sally is never far away.
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Sept 25, 2018 2:52:36 GMT 1
Nope. I think you simply don't understand English. You're trying hard to express a thought, but you're struggling to find the right vocab. OK, this is what you normally say to people you know are native English-speakers. That's not a question, simply an observation. You're not a native English-speaker? Why didn't you say so before? I just assumed your spelling was fuck-you lazy. I suppose it's the people I have to speak with. Mostly, I don't care what they think of me - including you, cowardly ratface. They find me supercilious mostly because I point out their idiocy, and that gets a bit irritating. I don't care. - that's the worst you can say about me, really. Not "solipsist", not even "egocentric". I simply don't care when people who are woefully ignorant start mouthing off about situations they don't understand and I correct them with the facts and still they insist on mouthing off with their foolish opinions when the upshot if the world in general took them seriously is millions of people will die. "Solipsist" is cockney slang for something is it?
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Sept 25, 2018 3:01:12 GMT 1
Yep. I call it as I see it. Noooo, nooooo. Shall we halt proceedings and do a proper tally? No "before" as far as I recall! As far as I recall, what you've broadcast so far - you might like to emend - is that you left college and went into the cs, rose through the ranks enough to rub shoulders with Thatcher and sit at the table to determine how to prevent incidents like the Rotherham debacle, and were humble yet deservedly elevated enough to turn down a certain amount of Establishment gongs. Please don't ask me to trawl through archives to verify all that nonsense. There's no calculus, really. Exploiter vs exploited, is all that it amounts to, really. I pay for you, you don't pay for me. I work for you, you don't work for me. It's as simple as that. If we're talking about "authoritarianism", We are, aren't we? None of your stuff is true. They're quotes of your past lies, then. You've learned something at last then. Don't bullshit on social media. Personally, I never believed you turned down any gongs anyway. I've read your posts.
|
|
|
Post by alancalverd on Sept 25, 2018 7:44:09 GMT 1
So no disagreement on the facts of the matter, then. Jeremy Corbyn is de acta et de dicta an antisemite.
|
|
|
Post by Progenitor A on Sept 25, 2018 7:58:44 GMT 1
So no disagreement on the facts of the matter, then. Jeremy Corbyn is de acta et de dicta an antisemite. I disagree
|
|