|
Post by aquacultured on Mar 7, 2019 1:11:28 GMT 1
You're both tilting at windmills. It's clear I was responding - in good humour - to personal vilification rather than climate or EU matters. Windmills, eh? Now, why would you so quixotically respond to your purely imaginary "personal vilification" by saying Boris, Jacob and Gove deserve a special place in hell? Do you feel somehow tormented by them? You've claimed before - with not a scintilla of justification, as usual, rationality being superfluous and requests for explanation presumptious in religious circles - that Boris is "disgusting". Take comfort. If we ever do actually leave the EU, you could always get together with other trusted europhiles and hold your own traditional services of worship in secret. Fly the EU flag, sing Deutschland Uber Alles, genuflect before the maroon passport... I gave MR the benefit of the doubt, but you? Your MO: just deliberate spite and invention not worthy of response. I'll just go to your point about Boris. I wouldn't use the word "disgusting" to sum up a human being. I might say they've done or written something in that line, but my humanistic principles would stop me doing the other. Happy for it to be proved otherwise, even to my shame.
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Mar 7, 2019 11:32:15 GMT 1
I have not made up the fact that you have hi-jacked the original post which contains the sort of facts Greens abhor. This board is about the environment NOT your personal vendettas.
If you have no comments to make on the original post STFU!
|
|
|
Post by aquacultured on Mar 7, 2019 12:50:57 GMT 1
It wasn't me who changed the subject, as you know.
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Mar 10, 2019 18:34:39 GMT 1
Windmills, eh? Now, why would you so quixotically respond to your purely imaginary "personal vilification" by saying Boris, Jacob and Gove deserve a special place in hell? Do you feel somehow tormented by them? You've claimed before - with not a scintilla of justification, as usual, rationality being superfluous and requests for explanation presumptious in religious circles - that Boris is "disgusting". Take comfort. If we ever do actually leave the EU, you could always get together with other trusted europhiles and hold your own traditional services of worship in secret. Fly the EU flag, sing Deutschland Uber Alles, genuflect before the maroon passport... There's no spite, or invention - can you point to any? No. You want me to find the quote? You might, but you didn't. Too much effort, I expect. How the liberal-left do love to stroke themselves. No shame. You're just a lazy thinker. That's okay, it's only a messageboard, you're allowed. Just don't expect your claims to being any more "humanistic" or "principled" or any of the other adjectives you like to congratulate your political views with will go unchallenged when they reveal quite the opposite. I've warned you about this habit before - the road to hell and so forth. You would have signed up to Hitler's new European order in 1940, granted - but don't try to pretend you'd have done so for noble motives.
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Mar 10, 2019 18:47:24 GMT 1
It wasn't me who changed the subject, as you know. Being a f*#kwit is the subject. Or you could try to be a thinking person, with interesting things to say and contribute to a productive discussion, like Marchesa. Just takes a little effort, see? Not little efforts at flacidly insulting poetry - thought.
|
|
|
Post by aquacultured on Mar 11, 2019 1:52:36 GMT 1
If I wanted to write insulting 'poetry' in the Augustan style, I'd choose a big target. Not available here, tho.
My 'poem', lightest of verses, not poetry, was innocuous as anyone can see.
That you don't see it reflects your dishonest MO.
OK, that's your persona: you see it but revel in pretending not to.
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Mar 12, 2019 18:51:44 GMT 1
If I wanted to write insulting 'poetry' in the Augustan style, I'd choose a big target. Not available here, tho. I'm sorry we don't meet your exacting standards. My "MO" is not in the least "dishonest", and I challenge anyone to attempt to substantiate such a charge. Neither would I describe being called gross, deserving a special place in hell, "innocuous", or "light", as it happens. I consider anyone who thinks so, like Tusk, a rabid extremist, in fact. I don't see it. What I see is a political extremist, and a stupid one (who believes unthinkingly that his prejudices are "principled" and "humanistic" - when in fact all they are are merely support for political beliefs that most feather his own nest, - lending him self-justification for abusing anyone who disagrees with him) but who pretends not to be. Look - if you could ever defend and rationalise in the least your thrown out abusive opinions, I'd consider you in a more worthy light. But whether through snobbery, a dismissive estimation of the worth of the people here, or through intellectual laziness, or through lack of reflective capability - my personal suspicion - you never do. That's your MO. The ickyness of you doing it via appalling poetry doesn't make it any the more attractive.
|
|