|
Post by helen on Feb 1, 2011 20:06:33 GMT 1
Can I go back to marchesarosa's problem with louise? Marchesarosa, you know that you hold a minority position as regards climate science so why does it surprise you that there are more people calling your world view into question than are there to support it? Evereytime some one happens here to hold an opinion that calls into question your world view doesn't mean that they are the same person in disguise.....this smacks of paranoia. To the host of this board. Please bear this in mind, someone, the pot, calling kettle black is not worthy of censure, if it is, the credulity of this board has to be called into question. Ban me again if you must for this but it has to be said.
|
|
|
Post by rsmith7 on Feb 1, 2011 20:09:34 GMT 1
I see the mothership has it's underlings concentrating on the "minority position" myth. Hilarious!
|
|
|
Post by helen on Feb 1, 2011 22:27:43 GMT 1
What the heck are you going on about RSmith? Mothership? Underlings? Myth.....sorry that's one of your favourite words. Back to Mothership and underlings. What's that all about? Further RSmith, stop posting the emoticons, all viewers of this site know that it's not nudge-wink leg pulling, they are are expressions of the most mordant sarcasm available to you.
|
|
|
Post by rsmith7 on Feb 1, 2011 22:41:02 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by helen on Feb 1, 2011 22:44:55 GMT 1
That's a new one on me RSmith, how you spend your spare time.....
|
|
|
Post by rsmith7 on Feb 1, 2011 22:50:27 GMT 1
That's a new one on me RSmith, how you spend your spare time..... Spare time??? What's that?
|
|
|
Post by helen on Feb 1, 2011 23:06:51 GMT 1
Well what was that that link you provided? Very off the wall and for someone with no spare time very odd? !!!! I've been reading the Millenium trilogy by Stieg Larsson. You know? The first book is the The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo, I'm close to the finish of the the final book of the three, The Girl Who Kicked The Hornets Nest. They are all superb crime thrillers and more.........superb. Set in 21st century Sweden and you are in there RSmith. Leave it for you to work out which from what. Recommend it! I'm quite nice really, wish you were!
|
|
|
Post by rsmith7 on Feb 1, 2011 23:25:04 GMT 1
Sorry darling - I'm taken.
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Feb 2, 2011 12:59:27 GMT 1
"I see the mothership has it's underlings concentrating on the "minority position" myth. Hilarious!"
Right, Mr Smith!
Helen is always the first to retail the latest warmist cadre attack strategy - the latest ad hominen snippet, the latest psychologising, the latest "confirmation bias" nonsense etc. She gets it all from her fav warmist crib sheets.
What we don't hear so much from her is any discussion of climate and related matters - she should take a lesson from Louise. Louise is at least on-topic for the board. Helen treats it like her personal knocking copy repository.
|
|
|
Post by speakertoanimals on Feb 2, 2011 14:30:53 GMT 1
Rumbled? For what? Benefit of the doubt? For what?
You seem to have more problems with here beliefs/position rather than her manner. You would do well to consider the difference, and also do well to consider your own position.
Frankly, this whole attempted attack on Louise is just garbage, just shows up even more than usual your actual position towards discussion boards and what you personally consider accepetable or not acceptable -- which frankly my dear seems to boils down to -- agrees with me equals nice, disagrees with me equals nasty.
And also shows the same sort of disregard for actual evidence as do your postings on climate science.
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Feb 2, 2011 21:08:05 GMT 1
Nice/nasty doesn't come into it.
This board has been assailed by several warmist clones since its inception, determined to bend it to their will. Louise is only the most recent. She is clearly identifiable as such by her posting strategy. However she has been dealt with and, as I said before, she does present the opportunity for the better informed amongst us to put her right so she does serve a useful function.
|
|
|
Post by helen on Feb 2, 2011 23:02:16 GMT 1
"She has been dealt with." For heavens sake: Pot, kettle, black? Come on ban me. This is a travesty. I'm away on holiday for a while, expect to see this forum peopled, sorry policed by marchesarosa, naymissus and his acolyte Abacuss, Carnyx and RSmith on my return. This is not a science forum.
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Feb 3, 2011 12:12:42 GMT 1
Do I detect yet ANOTHER threat to quit the board, helen?
Why do you always renege on these threats? You make them with monotonous regularity and have been doing so to my knwledge even during my recent posting episode on the now blessedly defunct BBC Science Board.
Unlike the weather YOU are incredibly predictable in your petulance, Helen.
In view of these repetitive and unfulfilled threats to leave, how can we possibly take your judgments on anything else seriously?
"First, know thyself", lady.
Enjoy your holiday, and please try to resist pestering me while you are away!
|
|
|
Post by speakertoanimals on Feb 3, 2011 14:45:49 GMT 1
So, yet another assertion without ANY evidence to back it up.
This is totally and utterly unjustified, and just sounds like your usual almost total disregard for evidence, and conpiracy-theorist approach to anyone and anything that dares to disagree with your entrenched belief system.
You really are totally contemptible M, that the NICEST way I can put it.
|
|
|
Post by rsmith7 on Feb 3, 2011 15:21:54 GMT 1
So, yet another assertion without ANY evidence to back it up. This is totally and utterly unjustified, and just sounds like your usual almost total disregard for evidence, and conpiracy-theorist approach to anyone and anything that dares to disagree with your entrenched belief system. You really are totally contemptible M, that the NICEST way I can put it. The "evidence" is plain to see; anyone cutting and pasting warmist propaganda ad nauseum then refusing to engage with points raised is displaying bad faith. The fact that this behaviour is standard from the warmists on many forums suggests it is a deliberate tactic with obvious ends in mind.
|
|