|
|
Post by speakertoanimals on Mar 26, 2011 15:19:07 GMT 1
O stop playing these SILLY games! I maqde it quite clear that order and increase in one open sub-system of a larger closed system, but only at the expense of an even greater increase in disorder in another open sub-system of the same larger closed system.
WHY you want to pretend that the order-disorder entropy is less fundamental than the thermodynamic is beyone me, and its just plain WRONG, as our your supposed objections to open and closed systems................
since (as usual) you appear to be totally unwillng to listen, I'm afraid this just seems to be another of your daft attempts at a wind-up, with no concern for who else you may confuse about entropy in the process.
Or you really are as ignorant about entropy as you pretend to be, which since you refuse to listen, makes it pointless for me to continue.
Only if you PRETEND to be as stupid as most creationists, which is probably a bit of a stretch, even for you!
Order ONLY ever increases at the cost of an even greater increase in disorder elsewhere. WHY do you keep pretending that I have ever said anything else? WHY do you keep pretending that the second law says anything else? And WHY in gods name are you prepared to stoop so low as to PRETEND to the same nonsense that creationists exploit, that is REALLY having no sense of decency, over and above the usual stupid ganes you play.
|
|
|
|
Post by Progenitor A on Mar 26, 2011 15:33:27 GMT 1
O stop playing these SILLY games! I maqde it quite clear that order and increase in one open sub-system of a larger closed system, but only at the expense of an even greater increase in disorder in another open sub-system of the same larger closed system. They are not silly games! You took a closed system, formed two open systems within a closed system and then described how order arose in one of the open systems. As that open system is a part of a closed system, then the order arose within a closed system You cannot follow your own logic! Your assertion that even greater disorder occurs elsewhere is bunkum. There will be some increased entropy but it can be far far less than the work put into ordering that you have described. You are simply making things up as you go along WHY you want to pretend that the order-disorder entropy is less fundamental than the thermodynamic is beyone me, and its just plain WRONG, as our your supposed objections to open and closed systems................ I make no such pretence! I am simply concerned at the contradictions of order to disorder entropy so beautifully demonstarted by your illogical eaxmple! since (as usual) you appear to be totally unwillng to listen, I'm afraid this just seems to be another of your daft attempts at a wind-up, with no concern for who else you may confuse about entropy in the process. Your blindness to the illogicality of your argument is remarkable. Or you really are as ignorant about entropy as you pretend to be, which since you refuse to listen, makes it pointless for me to continue. Only if you PRETEND to be as stupid as most creationists, which is probably a bit of a stretch, even for you! More personal attack! What awaste of time you are! Order ONLY ever increases at the cost of an even greater increase in disorder elsewhere. WHY do you keep pretending that I have ever said anything else? I have pretended no such thing! I am simply concerned with teh contradiction that order canarise out of disorder WHY do you keep pretending that the second law says anything else? I make no such pretence And WHY in gods name are you prepared to stoop so low as to PRETEND to the same nonsense that creationists exploit, that is REALLY having no sense of decency, over and above the usual stupid ganes you play. I have not once mentioned creationism ! I am not playing games. You simply cannot see your own contradictions! Decency has nothing to do with it you presumptuous buffooon! |
|
|
|
Post by speakertoanimals on Mar 26, 2011 15:40:09 GMT 1
I never said you did, except this is the SAME nonsense as creationists come out with,m to pretend that evolution is against the second law.
If you think you're actually having a discussion about science, even you aren't THAT stupid NM (or perhapds you are, perhaps you really can't tell the difference between this garbage and actual discussion).
The only contradictions are of your own creation, or in your supposed understanding.
Decency HAS everything to do with it, if you have any conscience at all, or do you think it is okay to spread ignorance under the guise of personal entertainment.....................
shame you can't even spell buffoon, who is lapsing into insults now.
End of 'discussion', you are a time-wasting person with no decency.
|
|
|
|
Post by Progenitor A on Mar 26, 2011 15:43:06 GMT 1
I never said you did, except this is the SAME nonsense as creationists come out with,m to pretend that evolution is against the second law. If you think you're actually having a discussion about science, even you aren't THAT stupid NM (or perhapds you are, perhaps you really can't tell the difference between this garbage and actual discussion). The only contradictions are of your own creation, or in your supposed understanding. Decency HAS everything to do with it, if you have any conscience at all, or do you think it is okay to spread ignorance under the guise of personal entertainment..................... shame you can't even spell buffoon, who is lapsing into insults now. End of 'discussion', you are a time-wasting person with no decency. Well if this signifies the end of your commenting upon my input I am happy with that! ;D |
|
