|
Post by StuartG on Feb 26, 2012 19:33:08 GMT 1
It does seem that as soon as your posts are challenged in any way, all that's done is to present yet another graph. Please stop distorting information Stuart
|
|
|
Post by nickrr on Feb 26, 2012 21:55:31 GMT 1
And here we get to the nub of the problem with deniers - you are driven by politics, not science. Boring. But true.
|
|
|
Post by rsmith7 on Feb 27, 2012 20:35:34 GMT 1
Nick, A reminder of my full, non cherry picked post:
I run a business and I'm doing quite well so I can afford the ludicrous taxes levied in the name of CAGW. I just have some empathy for the poor bastards that can't. Don't you?
|
|
|
Post by nickrr on Feb 27, 2012 22:20:22 GMT 1
Nick, A reminder of my full, non cherry picked post: I run a business and I'm doing quite well so I can afford the ludicrous taxes levied in the name of CAGW. I just have some empathy for the poor bastards that can't. Don't you? Why do you think that this has relevance to whether AGW is true or not? If it has no such relevance, what is this question doing in a thread about whether CO2 causes warming?
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Feb 28, 2012 3:14:23 GMT 1
My god! Nick actually admits there may be a debate about this going on. We ARE making progress! I thought the science was settled and only the remedies worthy of discussion.
|
|
|
Post by nickrr on Feb 28, 2012 18:35:46 GMT 1
I'm referring to a debate on this thread. This does not imply that there is a debate on this subject anywhere else.
Apologies to anyone who is capable of understanding English for wasting the 10 seconds or so it took you to read this.
|
|
|
Post by rsmith7 on Feb 28, 2012 21:19:37 GMT 1
So there's no debate about co2 nicky boy? Yeah, ok. You're obviously one of two things: A looney or A lefty.
The only possibilities at this stage of the debate.
|
|