|
|
Post by mrsonde on Sept 7, 2017 7:59:48 GMT 1
A couple of months ago NOAA issued a paper puzzling about why the strength and incidence of hurricanes in both the Pacific and Atlantic had since 2005 reached such an unprecedented low, despite all the previous predictions of "climate scientists" that things could only get worse. But fear not - now everyone, including humble weather forecasters on the BBC and Sky, are assuring us ll that the record wetness and strength of these two recent storms are yet more proof that climate change is back with a vengeance, as they've all been telling you since you had bedtime stories. "Trump must surely acknowledge that climate change is real now", says Thom. "The Caribbean is warmer, the storm is bigger, it's science man."
No one as far as I've noticed has pointed to the coincidence of the strength of Irma with the concurrent fact that we've being hit by an enormous CME - which is why you can now see the Northern Lights from Cornwall. A mere coincidence that was first observed and thoroughly measured as far back as the late 80s, but has yet to be explained - nor fed into any computer climate model.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Sept 14, 2017 15:11:01 GMT 1
Sky News has just claimed that the bill for Florida will cost "many hundreds of billions of dollars"!
Does anyone believe this? Talk about "Fake News".
|
|
|
|
Post by jonjel on Sept 14, 2017 15:39:05 GMT 1
Sky News has just claimed that the bill for Florida will cost "many hundreds of billions of dollars"! Does anyone believe this? Talk about "Fake News". That is just Trump again hyping it up. He is hoping for a bigger pay-out to replace a few damp carpets at his Mar-a-Lego fairy castle. |
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Sept 14, 2017 16:17:46 GMT 1
Sky News has just claimed that the bill for Florida will cost "many hundreds of billions of dollars"! Does anyone believe this? Talk about "Fake News". That is just Trump again hyping it up. Not Trump - Sky was reporting that his estimate of several billion was hopelessly optimistic. It was their "expert" reporter who thus corrected him with that lunatic claim. I think you can bet that Trump was insured. He's had it for, what, thirty or forty years? He'd have seen itflood many times before. It's the coast of Florida, for crissakes. |
|
|
|
Post by jonjel on Sept 15, 2017 17:06:30 GMT 1
That is just Trump again hyping it up. Not Trump - Sky was reporting that his estimate of several billion was hopelessly optimistic. It was their "expert" reporter who thus corrected him with that lunatic claim. I think you can bet that Trump was insured. He's had it for, what, thirty or forty years? He'd have seen itflood many times before. It's the coast of Florida, for crissakes. I know where his Lego land is MrS. I wonder if you could ever get insurance for anywhere in that location for flood? |
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Sept 19, 2017 9:09:09 GMT 1
Sure you can - the insurance companies are falling over themselves to sell it, because since Katrina the Fed now guarantees the payment and they can't lose.
And why "Legoland", incidentally? It's a fairly standard property for that part of the world. It cost less than Obama's Washington mansion. At least everyone knows where he got the money from to pay for it, unlike Obama's mysterious new-found millions, or the Clintons'. (Or, for that matter, Bernie Sanders - whom you wouldn't know from the mainstream media is under investigation by the FBI; or the truly egregious John McCain, who has so many properties he couldn't remember when asked exactly how many - six, Senator, it's six.)
|
|
