|
Post by marchesarosa on Jan 16, 2011 18:15:52 GMT 1
I see our Louise posted this on WUWT betraying her incompetence in a much larger arena than ours - WUWT is, after all, the world's most read climate blog!. ----- Louise says: January 14, 2011 at 6:19 am I can’t understand the table – why is the hottest year (1998) ranked as 116th? Surely it should be ranked 1st and so 2010 would be 23rd of 116 not, as you said, “ranking 94th out of 116"?
-------
When you have learned HOW to understand a table would be a good time to start opining about climate, I think, Louise.
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Jan 16, 2011 18:29:55 GMT 1
hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcet/graphs/HadCET_graph_ylybars_uptodate.gif2010 the warmest year ever? Not here in the UK, apparently. the CET (Central England Temperature series) started in 1659 shows that 2010 was actually lower than 1659! See that little blue line pointing downwards at the extreme right of the graph, Louise? And this graph comes from the sainted UK Met Office, Louise.
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Jan 16, 2011 18:40:44 GMT 1
Geir Nøklebye says: January 14, 2011 at 9:16 am According to the Norwegian MET Office, the average temperature for the country as a whole was 1 deg C below normal. This makes it the 10th coldest year on record for a series that goes back to the year 1900. You have to go back to 1941 to find a colder year. The coldest year in the series was 1915.
|
|
|
Post by louise on Jan 20, 2011 20:52:38 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by rsmith7 on Jan 20, 2011 21:11:26 GMT 1
Splicing the RSS and UAH data onto the end to "hide the decline" is a perfect example of this corruption. The other three datasets have been roundly condemned and shown to be "altered". Very sad.
|
|
|
Post by louise on Jan 20, 2011 21:17:49 GMT 1
Splicing the RSS and UAH data onto the end to "hide the decline" is a perfect example of this corruption. The other three datasets have been roundly condemned and shown to be "altered". Very sad. I think there must be something wrong with your eyesight. They aren't spliced on at the end - they are overlaid (i.e. they show the same trend).
|
|
|
Post by rsmith7 on Jan 20, 2011 22:05:29 GMT 1
Yes, but how have they been altered to fit?
|
|