|
|
Post by helen on Feb 3, 2011 15:51:30 GMT 1
"Anyone cutting and pasting warmist propaganda ad nauseum then refusing to engage with points raised is displaying bad faith." I've just cut and paste you RSmith.....You cross bases with marchesarosa: She cuts and pastes stuff from WUWT, Bishoprick and other sites and then refuses to engage with the points raised, especially if the points raised don't accord with her thread and mind set. It's not 'warmist' propaganda RSmith.....look back over the past few days and note who is cutting and pasting stuff. Do these folk not think that us rational observers don't access the spectrum of opinion on the net? When it comes to climate science, it troubles me that your vocally affeared hysteria and anti-intellectualism isn't helping humanity at all. I'm minded of the English civil war!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by speakertoanimals on Feb 3, 2011 17:06:07 GMT 1
Displaying bad faith isn't EVIDENCE of anything, apart from someone being a possible pain in the arse!
And seems one persons bad faith is anothers exemplary behaviour, because M is FAMOUS for cutting and pasting skeptic propaganda ad nauseam, and also refusing to engage with points raised.
So, we now plainly see what the deciding factor here is -- NOT actual behaviour, but just which set of believers you happen to belong to.
Mote and log methinks.
So, we're back to where we started -- M doesn't like Lousie because of which side she seems to be on, hence just ploughs in and accuses her of allsorts, with no actual evidence that she has been willing to provide for our examination.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joanne Byers on Feb 3, 2011 19:56:14 GMT 1
Totally off-topic for the thread, ladies, which is about the ethics of using on-line proxy servers. And evidence of the same old same old pettiness from two past masters of the art!
This thread is now closed.
|
|
