|
Post by lazarus on Sept 9, 2010 0:55:40 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Progenitor A on Sept 9, 2010 7:09:04 GMT 1
Just when we thought we could be on the verge of some unifying theory along comes this spanner. I wonder who 'we' is? But this is interesting and it will be more interesting (or dead in th ewater) as time goes on
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Sept 9, 2010 8:39:52 GMT 1
Maybe it's "Natural Variation".
|
|
|
Post by abacus9900 on Sept 9, 2010 10:09:06 GMT 1
We are usually told that the laws of physics are universally constant but I wonder if that can be true in view of the existence of 'dark matter', which is not composed of ordinary matter.
|
|
|
Post by lazarus on Sept 9, 2010 10:33:58 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Progenitor A on Sept 9, 2010 12:06:50 GMT 1
I see. Are you working in that field?
|
|
|
Post by speakertoanimals on Sept 9, 2010 14:10:26 GMT 1
There is a difference between saying the laws of physics are the same everywhere and everywhen (kind of what they are by definition, and saying that various supposed constants might instead vary across space or time. The latter is actually rather old hat.
The fact that we can understand what we see from distant galaxies far in the past at all, means that things were roughly the same (else we wouldn't see the exact same patterns of spectral lines as we see here on earth), but there is stil room for measurements as to whether things like the fine structure constant of the speed of light are truly constant, or just approximately so.
Not so much a spanner, it is NEW physics that we are looking for after all, in order to try and figure out how to make it all fit -- just that people would prefer the new to be something they were kind of expecting, as well as something with a much greater statistical significance.
|
|