|
Post by marchesarosa on Nov 30, 2011 20:43:07 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by nickrr on Nov 30, 2011 22:09:13 GMT 1
Because he knows that the underlying trend is warming but that in the short term some of this is being masked by increased emission of sulphates. He knows that sceptics will use this as a further excuse to prevaricate. This is all perfectly clear if you bother to read the full exchange of messages.
As with the first set of emails, it's easy to distort when you quote out of context. This is just more of the same dishonest tactics.
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Dec 1, 2011 2:43:41 GMT 1
Ah, yes, the "masking"!
Very good word to describe a total lack of evidence for CO2-induced warming.
|
|