|
Post by mrsonde on Jul 16, 2018 11:27:16 GMT 1
Come on! It can't stick in your gullet that much, surely? I'll help you,inexplicably:
That's interesting Nick, I wasn't aware of that, and would like to learn more. Would you post me a link to that scientific proof, please, if it's not too much trouble (and sorry for all the years of abuse I've hurled your way in the past, I've turned over a new leaf).
Okay. Copy and paste. Errr...you hold the cursor over the bits you want to copy, left click, usually, highlight copy;then left click again and "paste" it into your post. Like magic, isn't it? You can skip the parenthetical part - I'm sure that won't get down your reptilian neck, and I'm not cruel.
Then we'll get onto asking me and Nay to help you understand how music works, shall we? You've been waiting years for that one.
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Jul 16, 2018 11:30:31 GMT 1
Not me, you moron. I don't give a toss what you say - it's a given by now that it's merely ignorant drivel. Are you sure that's what you meant to write, Jean? Sadly, we're still falling a mite short on the "ask" and "politely" criteria.
|
|
|
Post by jean on Jul 16, 2018 12:05:56 GMT 1
You’re priceless.
|
|
|
Post by Progenitor A on Jul 16, 2018 12:24:08 GMT 1
From a Christian Aid interview in 2016: medium.com/christian-aid-eu-referendum/eu-referendum-remain-or-leave-justine-greening-mp-has-her-say-ebcbaa660a2Justine Greening is Member of Parliament for Putney, London, and since 2012 has been Secretary of State for International Development. The 23 June EU referendum will be the most important vote on the future of our country that we are likely to have in our lifetimes. It’s a one-off vote. There’s no re-doing it if we change our minds. We’re all going to have to live with the result, but the younger you are, the more there is at stake.
Like millions of other people in the UK, I’ve never had the chance to vote on this before. I was too young to vote in the last EU referendum in 1975. There are pros and cons whichever direction we take. My view, on balance, is that we are better off staying in the EU. I must repeat, the vote is one-off (if you vote the right way); if you vote the wrong way then you are entitled to a second vote, which will also be a one-off vote (terms and conditions apply). Tis statement is endorsed by the EU
|
|
|
Post by aquacultured on Jul 17, 2018 0:05:45 GMT 1
Face it Mr S, you've been caught lying. Or, as a parasite would put it, being selective with the truth. I never lie, as it happens, not since I was a twenty yr old or so. So you're not human then.
|
|
|
Post by fascinating on Jul 17, 2018 8:23:48 GMT 1
mrsonde said "It was genuine. All you have to do is ask, politely." - which of course Jean did. This bleating demand for politeness comes from the most insulting person on the board.
There's no proof that "anto-neoplaston treatment" is a "proven cure for bowel cancer". Move on.
|
|
|
Post by nickrr on Jul 17, 2018 20:53:25 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by aquacultured on Jul 18, 2018 0:20:03 GMT 1
mrsonde said "It was genuine. All you have to do is ask, politely." - which of course Jean did. This bleating demand for politeness comes from the most insulting person on the board. Yes, this sort of thing is all too frequent. Often it's against a figment, with no provocation. And yet he pre-emptively strikes most of the time, spewing out half-digested morsels he's garnered in vain..
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Jul 18, 2018 16:09:54 GMT 1
You don't really want to see the independently researched scientific proof of anti-neoplaston treatment, then? I didn't think so. Watch these clips instead. Then try telling these kids and their parents that Burzynski is a "charlatan".
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Jul 18, 2018 16:15:04 GMT 1
From a Christian Aid interview in 2016: medium.com/christian-aid-eu-referendum/eu-referendum-remain-or-leave-justine-greening-mp-has-her-say-ebcbaa660a2Justine Greening is Member of Parliament for Putney, London, and since 2012 has been Secretary of State for International Development. The 23 June EU referendum will be the most important vote on the future of our country that we are likely to have in our lifetimes. It’s a one-off vote. There’s no re-doing it if we change our minds. We’re all going to have to live with the result, but the younger you are, the more there is at stake.
Like millions of other people in the UK, I’ve never had the chance to vote on this before. I was too young to vote in the last EU referendum in 1975. There are pros and cons whichever direction we take. My view, on balance, is that we are better off staying in the EU. I must repeat, the vote is one-off (if you vote the right way); if you vote the wrong way then you are entitled to a second vote, which will also be a one-off vote (terms and conditions apply). Tis statement is endorsed by the EU If there is a three-way vote as she proposes, my money - a lot of it - would be on the "No Deal" option. I think it would be a landslide. I think it's quite likely, now, that there will be such a vote. Though probably not the three-way ballot she proposes - I can't see the estblishment allowing that, given this likely outcome. But if they don't allow a no deal option, there'll be a mass revolt - in the polling stations, if not the streets.
|
|
|
Post by jean on Jul 18, 2018 21:46:05 GMT 1
You don't really want to see the independently researched scientific proof of anti-neoplaston treatment, then? Of course I do. I have said so. Fortunately, others are happy to divulge what you will not. [my emphasis.] So not quite the ringing endorsement you claimed to have access to. Watch these clips instead... Why on earth would you imagine I'd be swayed by a partial, emotive, unscientific bit of propaganda like that?
|
|
|
Post by jean on Jul 18, 2018 23:32:00 GMT 1
I think it must be, thanks. There's a comment that asks some very pertinent questions. It is, isn't it? Its only purpose seems to be to provide an excuse for not divulging something that is nothing like as cogent as he claimed.
|
|
|
Post by aquacultured on Jul 18, 2018 23:54:23 GMT 1
Give 'im a break.
He's only a chancer, after all.
|
|
|
Post by alancalverd on Jul 19, 2018 8:07:21 GMT 1
I think it's quite likely, now, that there will be such a vote. Though probably not the three-way ballot she proposes - I can't see the estblishment allowing that, given this likely outcome. But if they don't allow a no deal option, there'll be a mass revolt - in the polling stations, if not the streets. But who would they vote for? A Conservative party that promised but failed to deliver last time, or a Labour party that ignores its members and doesn't want to deliver anyway? UKIP is too busy looking up its own arse to form a government and has no domestic policy. Which leaves us with LibDems + Greens, or various communists and fascists united by a loathing for Europe but equally driven by a loathing for everything else including each other.
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Jul 20, 2018 15:47:54 GMT 1
But you just can't bring yourself to be civil in order to get it.
That's one study, not the one I was referring to, obviously.
Anyone has access to it, it's published, and, as I've said, it's linked to on Burzynski's site.
Why is it any of those things? It's sworn testimony before Congress - one of dozens of such examples. People previously condemned to death or worse by cancer experts, completely cured by anti-neoplaston therapy.
I don't imagine you'd be swayed by any such facts, Jean. As we've seen time and time again, you'll believe what you choose to believe, whatever the truth. In this case, if it's not approved and administered by the State or under its centralised authority, you want to crush it. Yiou think Science should be run as a Stalinist government department, like every other facet of life, and if it can't be it's of no "use" to you.
|
|