Post by StuartG on Oct 29, 2010 20:15:23 GMT 1
'Nations agree historic deal to save nature'
All well and good I suppose, until the remarks/comments are read at the end of the article. Who do WWF and Greenpeace purport to speak for? They must speak for all the rest of You, not for me. You might say that the vested interests are on one side of the argument, I would counter that their tactics and 'business' interests [f'instance attempts at carbon trading] makes them just the other side of the same coin.
Reuters
DOI: Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:28pm BST
uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE69S3SH20101029
in short, who the bloooody hell do they think they are?
Stuart
pdf...
'Restoring tropical diversity: beating the time tax
on species loss'
CRISTINA MARTÍNEZ-GARZA and HENRY F. HOWE
www.globalrestorationnetwork.org/uploads/files/LiteratureAttachments/282_restoring-tropical-diversity---beating-the-time-tax-on-species-loss.pdf
mod: HOW to HOWE
All well and good I suppose, until the remarks/comments are read at the end of the article. Who do WWF and Greenpeace purport to speak for? They must speak for all the rest of You, not for me. You might say that the vested interests are on one side of the argument, I would counter that their tactics and 'business' interests [f'instance attempts at carbon trading] makes them just the other side of the same coin.
Reuters
DOI: Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:28pm BST
uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE69S3SH20101029
in short, who the bloooody hell do they think they are?
Stuart
pdf...
'Restoring tropical diversity: beating the time tax
on species loss'
CRISTINA MARTÍNEZ-GARZA and HENRY F. HOWE
www.globalrestorationnetwork.org/uploads/files/LiteratureAttachments/282_restoring-tropical-diversity---beating-the-time-tax-on-species-loss.pdf
mod: HOW to HOWE