|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Nov 22, 2010 18:31:31 GMT 1
Why don't they return to their original raison d'etre - protecting Wildlife? Not sexy enough, perhaps, when you can claim to be saving the World?  |
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Nov 22, 2010 18:34:30 GMT 1
And what a perfectly crass sentiment! "Stop Climate Change"! What climate change?
Obviously from the same mindset that thinks exploding dissenters is cutting edge!
|
|
|
|
Post by helen on Nov 22, 2010 19:19:41 GMT 1
Who is exploding dissenters. The science isn't settled and you and whilst your coterie of politically motivated anti-science cabal are slowly exposed as snake oil salesmen......eveidence, global warming is happening, where's the evidence that it's not. Sea ice? Wrong, hurricanes? spurious, CO2 specious and anti-science in the extreme. You don't accept the chemistry and physics of CO2 in the atmosphere (don't deny this or I'll post a score of messages in support of my accusation) so why should we accept the validity of any of the stuff you uncritically cut and paste from Watt's etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by rsmith7 on Nov 22, 2010 21:03:19 GMT 1
Keep your knickers on luv.  |
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Nov 23, 2010 4:15:43 GMT 1
"Who is exploding dissenters?" asks Helen.
That fabulous 10:10 troupe of monkeys who produced Splattergate, of course!
Short memories, some folk!
The warmist propaganda is becoming ever more strident and grotesque, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Nov 23, 2010 4:57:57 GMT 1
When warmists can demonstrate that purportedly observed "anthropogenic (i.e. CO2-induced) climate change" differs in any way from long observation of natural variation I will give them the time of day. Not until then.
|
|
|
|
Post by helen on Nov 23, 2010 16:26:25 GMT 1
Mary, it's up to you and yours to falsify the hypothesis!!!!!! Facts, come on, give us the facts!
Alamo, Alamo, Alamo, sorry, it's a cheap point but they may have died heroes but they lost the battle and the war was wrong headed!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by enquirer on Nov 23, 2010 18:45:28 GMT 1
When warmists can demonstrate that purportedly observed "anthropogenic (i.e. CO2-induced) climate change" differs in any way from long observation of natural variation I will give them the time of day. Not until then. Scientists have demonstrated this time and again - snip Try here www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us-intermediate.htm "The human fingerprint in global warming is evident in multiple lines of empirical evidence - in satellite measurements of outgoing infrared radiation, in surface measurements of downward infrared radiation, in the cooling stratosphere and other metrics. " or here www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm"Direct observations find that CO2 is rising sharply due to human activity. Satellite and surface measurements find less energy is escaping to space at CO2 absorption wavelengths. Ocean and surface temperature measurements find the planet continues to accumulate heat. This gives a line of empirical evidence that human CO2 emissions are causing global warming. " snip Exercise some board manners or you will be banned again enquirer. Joanne. |
|
