|
Post by marchesarosa on Feb 11, 2011 18:18:38 GMT 1
Phil Davies MP for Shipley (local to me!)
House of Commons debate on Wind farms.
The bottom line is that these policies will produce for Britain the most expensive electricity in the world if we carry on down this particular route. Is it morally or politically acceptable, particularly at a time of national austerity when families are struggling to pay their bills, for the Government to keep raising them just to meet an EU target? I do not think it is. It will hit the poorest people in our communities first...
The point is that I find it nauseating to hear politicians for ever bleating on about how terrible fuel poverty is when those very same politicians advocate policies that entrench fuel poverty in this country and make it worse. They should be honest about what they are doing. They cannot in one breath say, "I want to see more wind power in this country; it will add this amount of money to people's bills," and in the next breath say, "Isn't it terrible how bad fuel poverty is?" I find that nauseating.
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Feb 11, 2011 18:21:50 GMT 1
Graham Stringer (the only MP with balls on SciTech Select Cttee) also made a contribution in the same debate:
".......... There are not only good local reasons to stop wind farms; at a national level, they are ineffective and inefficient at contributing to the energy supply. Not only do they require huge subsidies, they must be backed up by coal-fired stations running at lower efficiency just in case the wind does not blow. ........"
|
|