|
Post by louise on Mar 9, 2011 14:35:08 GMT 1
For when the winds don't blow?
|
|
|
Post by principled on Mar 9, 2011 14:49:51 GMT 1
Or we could feed the curent into a super conductor coil...once we get them to operate thus at room temperature! But, where exactly is the energy coming from to do the above or to spin the flywheels? First we need an excess of enrgy output over consumption. To guarantee this we need even more wind turbines so that there is guaranteed a excess! Who's going to pay?
Oh dear, I feel yet another tax scam coming on. P
|
|
|
Post by rsmith7 on Mar 9, 2011 14:53:28 GMT 1
Yep, no co2 released in the building of the massive plant required to store a meaningful amount of energy. You need to start thinking in GWhrs, louise....and try to imagine how many of these silly devices would be required....and how much of that horrible pollutant, co2, would be emitted in their production. Nowt as blind as a zealot.
|
|
|
Post by rsmith7 on Mar 9, 2011 14:59:29 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by jonjel on Mar 9, 2011 15:08:28 GMT 1
There was a pilot scheme in Scotland years ago where they pumped water up from one loch to a higher one at night when there was an abundance of unused energy then used that same water to generate power during the day.
Simple cheap and effective.
|
|
|
Post by rsmith7 on Mar 9, 2011 15:17:33 GMT 1
Pumped storage you're referring to is a standard method of balancing the grid. Hydro electric dams spend much of their time pumping uphill.
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Mar 10, 2011 9:51:41 GMT 1
Perhaps Louise can explain the "meaning" of her OP? I am mystified by it. Is this type of "energy storage" deemed a joke (a "crock" in warmist ideology) or a viable technology? I'm sure Louise can explain it to us non-technologists.
|
|