|
Post by mrsonde on Jul 20, 2018 17:36:41 GMT 1
In the case of Dr Burzynski, you claim to know but won't share your knowledge. I'm very happy to "share my knowledge". All you have to do is ask, politely. But who cares? I'm happy to provide it. Or you can follow my simple directions on how to find it yourself. Why you can't is the only inexplicable thing here. Everything you've so far claimed "to know" about that is wrong, as I've demonstrated. I missed it, on either occasion. Actually - I think you're lying again. Confused about the meaning of ask again, perhaps, at best. Provide the link to these remarkable deviations from your characteristic truculence, please, if you would. Too much to ask that you'd want to explore a subject yourself, of course. Forget learning anything further, then - you'll just have to ask Nay for his help with some simple drawing. Still waiting. When you're ready. You want me to provide a cut-and-paste option? Just repeat after me... Nay is waiting to be asked to use his expertise in CorelDraw. Whether he accedes to your request will be up to him. If he tells you to sling one, I certainly wouldn't be surprised. I can't imagine why he'd want to put himself out for you after your years of abuse, can you?
|
|
|
Post by jean on Jul 20, 2018 17:47:06 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Jul 20, 2018 18:02:37 GMT 1
Everything you've so far claimed "to know" about that is wrong, as I've demonstrated. You've made assertions; you haven't demonstrated anything. You lie, yet again. I have demonstrated, mathematically, that your claims about music are wrong - actually, factually wrong. For just one obvious example, the notes you claim to sing correctly according to your "theory" about how music works (taken from standard musicology texts, of course - you've never formulated a theory about anything in your life) I have demonstrated to be wrong notes, that you nor anyone else would ever sing. Paste anything you consider wrong, you bone-idle fool, and I'll refute any objections you might have. Nice of you to be so interested. What is it you want me to respond to, pray tell? Happy to, as always. Please try to remember that some of us have work to do, and can't waste too much time indulging your twittering nonsense. If you want my "contribution", why don't you - you'll get it, if you hurry up, and catch me while I've got the time on my hands. Please believe me, you haven't been left hanging because you've said anything particularly clever!
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Jul 20, 2018 18:04:39 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by jean on Jul 20, 2018 18:16:17 GMT 1
Nay is waiting to be asked to use his expertise in CorelDraw. Nay, could you very kindly share with me your expertise in CorelDraw, with a view to arriving at a definitive explanation of the Foundations of Music?Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by jean on Jul 20, 2018 18:18:21 GMT 1
You lie, yet again. I have demonstrated, mathematically, that your claims about music are wrong - actually, factually wrong. For just one obvious example, the notes you claim to sing correctly according to your "theory" about how music works ... I have demonstrated to be wrong notes... Don't be silly. You couldn't possibly have done that, as you've never heard me sing.
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Jul 20, 2018 18:19:16 GMT 1
Nay is waiting to be asked to use his expertise in CorelDraw. Nay, could you very kindly share with me your expertise in CorelDraw, with a view to arriving at a definitive explanation of the Foundations of Music?Thank you. Very good. You've skipped me, however - or provide the link requested, where you claim to have already done so, and I'll take it as retrospectively valid. Then of course, we've yet to see if Nay is so amenable, to either of us.
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Jul 20, 2018 18:21:46 GMT 1
You lie, yet again. I have demonstrated, mathematically, that your claims about music are wrong - actually, factually wrong. For just one obvious example, the notes you claim to sing correctly according to your "theory" about how music works ... I have demonstrated to be wrong notes... Don't be silly. You couldn't possibly have done that, as you've never heard me sing. You made the claim. I don't need to hear you make such a mistake, ffs. You've claimed to sing the note as notated according to the prescribed interval on the score. I've shown you how that note so prescribed would be several c/S out, and would be recognised by anyone with normal hearing as being incorrect. You've yet to respond to this simple fact, either to explain how you know it's incorrect, so you don't actually sing it, or how you know which note is correct instead. The issue between us is of course what it is you "know" when you perform this, to you, inexplicable feat. Can you do so now?
|
|
|
Post by jean on Jul 20, 2018 18:29:32 GMT 1
You've claimed to sing the note as notated according to the prescribed interval on the score. I've shown you how that note so prescribed would be several c/S out, and would be recognised by anyone with normal hearing as being incorrect. And I have explained to you many times that the tiny adjustments necessary when singing unaccompanied are well within the compass of the note as written in standard musical notation. The adjustments are made by ear. All singers and players of non-fixed-pitch instruments do this instinctively. grasp thatsimple fact.
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Jul 20, 2018 18:29:40 GMT 1
I've started another thread for you, Jean - this has nothing to do with Brexit. Merely a coincidence of your habitual rudeness, that's all.
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Jul 20, 2018 18:31:31 GMT 1
You've claimed to sing the note as notated according to the prescribed interval on the score. I've shown you how that note so prescribed would be several c/S out, and would be recognised by anyone with normal hearing as being incorrect. And I have explained to you many times that the tiny adjustments necessary when singing unaccompanied are wwell within the compass of the note as written. You've yet to respond to thatsimple fact. I refuted that false claim, by showing you, mathematically, that such an adjustment is often more than a semi-tone out. None of this is annotated on the score, yet you and everyone else knows - hears - it. How is this possible? Answer a question for once, please.
|
|
|
Post by jean on Jul 20, 2018 18:34:30 GMT 1
I refuted that false claim, by showing you, mathematically, that such an adjustment is often more than a semi-tone out. None of this is annotated on the score, yet you and everyone else knows - hears - it. How is this possible? Answer a question for once, please. I've just told you! And it's never as much as a semitone. (But what are you doing talking about semirones? You don't beileve in intervals, remember.)
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Jul 20, 2018 18:38:46 GMT 1
I refuted that false claim, by showing you, mathematically, that such an adjustment is often more than a semi-tone out. None of this is annotated on the score, yet you and everyone else knows - hears - it. How is this possible? Answer a question for once, please. I've just told you! And it's never as much as a semitone. Yes it is, often. I gave you an example. I'll do so again if you want. Huh? You're completely lost, aren't you? Do you actually know what an "interval" is? Jean - this is the wrong thread for this discussion. This is about Brexit. I've started a new thread for you.
|
|
|
Post by jean on Jul 20, 2018 18:43:20 GMT 1
Yes it is, often. I gave you an example. I'll do so again if you want. Please do. Of course. But do you? It wasn't I who introduced music into it. (I didn't introduce Dr Burzynski either.) But I'm not interested in your new thread - there are plenty of unfinished old ones hanging around. You didn't say whether you wanted me to dig them up.
|
|
|
Post by mrsonde on Jul 20, 2018 19:27:32 GMT 1
Yes it is, often. I gave you an example. I'll do so again if you want. Please do. Sure - but answer the question first. It shouldn't matter how large the "intuitive correction" is, should it? Why, if it's the correct interval, should it need any correction at all? And what is it that you're correcting to? Yes. It's a step between notes as determined by the scale of notes you're using. Your claim is that this is how music is constructed - written, performed, and understood. My claim is that this is wrong, as I've demonstrated to you, and have just done so again, as evinced by your inability to give an account of the basis on which such intervals need to be and are "corrected". It wasn't music that was being introduced - it was merely another example of how rude you are, and how glibly you lie. Fine - carry on. We're all used to your bull-like arrogance and your insistence on being needlessly disruptive. I said - paste whatever questions you're still awaiting an answer to. I'll do the same - just for the ones you've ignored today, shall I?
|
|