|
Post by jean on Feb 12, 2011 10:37:57 GMT 1
and yet by your own definition, 'piling in' doesn't exist. Not every instance of piling in that the casual observer iimagines they see deserves that name, mercury; that much I would claim. But when we have posters openly chatting to each other about how stupid the selected target is and how one really ought not to reply to them, ever, then I think the term may justly be used. Don't you agree?
|
|
|
Post by jean on Feb 12, 2011 10:40:19 GMT 1
According to the list of topics, abacus started this thread, but the first message is now by rsmith, so I guess that abacus's first message was deleted. Rsmith's first message looks like a response to an earlier message, not the first message of a thread. That explains it! As I remember, the OP invited us to consider whether sexuality was fixed at birth.
|
|
|
Post by Progenitor A on Feb 12, 2011 10:47:00 GMT 1
@jeanhartrick#83 I see you are Stereotyping like a good-un!.. ..... but it looks like mere name-calling hiding fears; gerontophobia and misandry. (I did ask earlier if, among the homosexual sub-populations, homosexual stereotypes were in use; but you will not say. Is it because you do not know?.. not even 'scene' or 'non-scene' for instance?) I wouldn't worry about the foolish Schoolmarm Carnyx, after all, she does not come her for the science does she now? She comes her to be affronted in various ways, in just the same way as she chased the Toad across multitudinous Cyber-borders in order to hear the most disgusting insults repeated and repeated- she has an obsession to be insulted - so much so that at least one board has banned her because of that obsession -now that Toad is out of bounds she seeks new prurient punishment fields and is looking to be chastised (for what?) right here And isn't it odd how she stands and squeals like a virgin on a chair confronted with a mouse when the words 'Dyke' and 'Diesel Dyke' are mentioned? After all it is STA herself that calls herself a Dyke - I would not dream of using that term to describe her had she not used it of herself, and it is dear STA again that proudly describes some of her friends as 'Diesel Dykes' (whether, as she boasts, they drive rigs or not). But then moral relativism is so commonplace amongst the preciously stupid isn't it, the fact that certain words are allowed by one group but not by another?
|
|
|
Post by jean on Feb 12, 2011 10:57:26 GMT 1
(When posters start referencing half-remembered - and misremembered - incidents from other boards far away and long ago, one senses that they are flailing wildly.)
|
|
|
Post by abacus9900 on Feb 12, 2011 10:57:37 GMT 1
Oh, I didn't know she had been banned. Which board naymissus?
|
|
|
Post by mercury on Feb 12, 2011 11:01:32 GMT 1
and yet by your own definition, 'piling in' doesn't exist. Not every instance of piling in that the casual observer iimagines they see deserves that name, mercury; that much I would claim. But when we have posters openly chatting to each other about how stupid the selected target is and how one really ought not to reply to them, ever, then I think the term may justly be used. Don't you agree? i would agree becaue it is what i've been saying all this time about your behaviour. only the adjectives change. but would you not agree that STA is guilty of using exactly the same language that you describe? perhaps for the sake of everyone, we should leave this here before it turns into one of your classic 26 pagers.
|
|
|
Post by Progenitor A on Feb 12, 2011 11:05:10 GMT 1
Oh, I didn't know she had been banned. Which board naymissus? Can't quite remember the name -Jencin's board or something like that. Try asking her. Insult her too.That's why she is here
|
|
|
Post by abacus9900 on Feb 12, 2011 11:08:45 GMT 1
All I have said is that science has not so far revealed a 'gay' gene or genes which can be directly attributable to homosexuality. This is purely an objective position and so is this discussion, at least on my part.
|
|
|
Post by Progenitor A on Feb 12, 2011 11:10:26 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by jean on Feb 12, 2011 11:11:44 GMT 1
perhaps for the sake of everyone, we should leave this here before it turns into one of your classic 26 pagers. A pity you didn't think of that before you misguidedly intervened on this thread in support of abacus, having quite misunderstood what he was saying. And you know, I cannot do 26 pages all by myself. There has to be at least one other poster with the bone as firmly between their teeth as it is between mine. (My arguments with the Toad were like that, though as nay rightly says, the insults were all in one direction - from him to me. His views on feminism, and on homosexuality, were such that I could not leave them without a reply, and these long posts threatened to take over many a board and bore other posters to death. He was banned from a number of boards for his most disgusting insults. But one board owner decided not to run the risk of these long exchanges developing in the first place, and elected to have him on her board rather than me. That was her choice. Yet even though I wasn't there, he chose to refer to me by name and had to be reprimanded for it and edit or delete his posts. Whether I ever sought these insults is quite another question, and one I would obviously give a negative answer to. Even more interesting is nay's suggestion that what he and carnyx address to me here is in some way comparable to the most disgusting insults of the Toad's. He can't really mean that, can he?)
|
|
|
Post by abacus9900 on Feb 12, 2011 13:18:17 GMT 1
perhaps for the sake of everyone, we should leave this here before it turns into one of your classic 26 pagers. A pity you didn't think of that before you misguidedly intervened on this thread in support of abacus, having quite misunderstood what he was saying. And you know, I cannot do 26 pages all by myself. There has to be at least one other poster with the bone as firmly between their teeth as it is between mine. She brings most of the scorn upon herself. (My arguments with the Toad were like that, though as nay rightly says, the insults were all in one direction - from him to me. His views on feminism, and on homosexuality, were such that I could not leave them without a reply, and these long posts threatened to take over many a board and bore other posters to death. He was banned from a number of boards for his most disgusting insults. But one board owner decided not to run the risk of these long exchanges developing in the first place, and elected to have him on her board rather than me. That was her choice. Yet even though I wasn't there, he chose to refer to me by name and had to be reprimanded for it and edit or delete his posts. Whether I ever sought these insults is quite another question, and one I would obviously give a negative answer to. Even more interesting is nay's suggestion that what he and carnyx address to me here is in some way comparable to the most disgusting insults of the Toad's. He can't really mean that, can he?) It's quite surprising to me how many apologists come to the aid of STA, as though she was the poor little down-trodden female who is abused and misunderstood and bullied for no reason other than male piggery. What nonsense! She brings most of the scorn upon herself.
|
|
|
Post by jean on Feb 12, 2011 14:19:08 GMT 1
..And you know, I cannot do 26 pages all by myself. There has to be at least one other poster with the bone as firmly between their teeth as it is between mine. She brings most of the scorn upon herself.Please note that the words She brings most of the scorn upon herself were inserted by abacus into the supposed 'quotation' from my post that he gives above. I did not write them. And since my post does not mention STA either explicitly or implicitly, abacus's reply, whatever its merits, is not a reply to anything I wrote.
|
|
|
Post by louise on Feb 12, 2011 15:39:12 GMT 1
Please note that the words She brings most of the scorn upon herself were inserted by abacus into the supposed 'quotation' from my post that he gives above. I did not write them. That seems to be a very dishonest thing to do. Abacus - perhaps you should edit your post to show that the post of simplex's that you quoted did not include those words. Alternatively, perhaps the admin here could do that?
|
|
|
Post by abacus9900 on Feb 12, 2011 16:42:14 GMT 1
Please note that the words She brings most of the scorn upon herself were inserted by abacus into the supposed 'quotation' from my post that he gives above. I did not write them. That seems to be a very dishonest thing to do. Abacus - perhaps you should edit your post to show that the post of simplex's that you quoted did not include those words. Alternatively, perhaps the admin here could do that? Seems to be some skulduggery going on here, I did no such thing and I don't care for the accusation Louise. I think simplex is just trying to stir up trouble. If you prefer to believe what simplex says that's not my problem.
|
|
|
Post by jean on Feb 12, 2011 16:54:17 GMT 1
I did no such thing and I don't care for the accusation Louise. I think simplex is just trying to stir up trouble. If you prefer to believe what simplex says that's not my problem. I can't insert passages into your posts, abacus, so if there's any skulduggery going on, it certainly isn't mine. Have another look at the quote you posted, purportedly from me.
|
|